From: Ian Glendinning (ian@psybertron.org)
Date: Tue Feb 01 2005 - 10:01:13 GMT
Hi Marsha,
Proof, ... or credible evidence ?
Proof is overrated IMHO.
(BTW you know I often remark that Pirsig is a fallible human like the rest
of us. I was talking of the MoQ itself, or some framework like it, as you
were too.)
Ian
----- Original Message -----
From: "MarshaV" <marshalz@charter.net>
To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic
> At 02:35 PM 1/31/2005 +0000, you wrote:
>>True, but it requires "faith" in the MoQ.
>>
>>Belief, in the absence of fundamental first principles objective argument,
>>that MoQ (or something like it) is the best evolved story so far.
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> Well, I suppose I have faith that Robert M. Pirsig exists. But if you
> tell me he's all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful, I'd expect for
> proof.
>
> Marsha
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 10:10:37 GMT