From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Feb 16 2005 - 16:49:35 GMT
I am sorry you feel so threatened by women who disagree with you Chuck but I will not take your sexist, immature, ignorant advice. Why don't you be less Rigelian and worry a little more about the quality of your contributions and less about mine.
Erin
Charles Roghair <ctr@pacificpartssales.com> wrote:
Erin:
It's better for everyone's understanding when you're off fiddling with
your domain or whatever it is you were doing before joining this
discussion; please go back to that and let the men talk.
No offense, Marsha.
Best regards,
Chuck
On Feb 15, 2005, at 2:39 PM, Erin wrote:
>
>
> Ron Winchester
wrote:
>
> RON: Each individual can have their own exprience, and it
> can be empirical to them. Whether its interpretation is emprical to
> society
> depends on the static patterns, and whether it works its way in.
>
> ERIN: So you do see a difference between these experiences? Then why
> not
> distinguish them. To me it is like saying dynamic quality and static
> quality is just quality so just call them quality. If things are
> different
> in some way then I find it helps to clarify to distinguish them. I
> would
> call both experience but only the latter empirical.
>
>
> RON: I see no reason to categorize the experiences under subcategories
> of what is
> legitimate, and what is not.
>
> ERIN: I already said I don't agree with interchanging verifiable and
> validity/legitimacy
>
> RON:
> Simple fifth grade English taught us how to understand the meanings
> of words
> in the context in which we read them. As opposed to categorizing,
> defining,
> and explaining them, why not simply read the words are they were
> written to
> mean?
>
> ERIN: I don't know what you are trying to say here
>
> RON: I must come clean and tell you that I see all this attention to
> the word as
> silly; as a knee jerk, emotional reaction. Otherwise, it is as Scott
> offered
> earlier -- reducing philosophy to a game. Either way, I see it as
> counter
> productive to advancing your understanding.
>
> ERIN: I will choose what is silly to spend time on and what is
> helpful to advancing my understanding. If you find it is not helping
> your understanding then ignore the thread.
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 16 2005 - 16:54:16 GMT