RE: MD Schleirmacher again

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sun Feb 27 2005 - 00:20:33 GMT

  • Next message: Erin: "RE: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic"

    Sam and all MOQers:

    Sam Norton quoted from "Theology Today":
    At the cutting edge of time, before an object can be distinguished, there
    must be a kind of nonintellectual awareness, which he called awareness of
    Quality. You can't be aware that you've seen a tree until after you've seen
    the tree, and between the instant of vision and the instant of awareness
    there must be a time lag. . . Any intellectually conceived object is always
    in the past and therefore unreal. Reality is always the moment of vision
    before the intellectualization takes place. There is no other reality.

    dmb replies:
    Strange that this should come up in an article about reviving the trinity.
    Anyway, I wanted to call your attention to a mistake. Notice how the author
    explains it in terms of a pre-existing tree and pre-existing viewer of the
    tree? He is talking about the pre-intellectual reality in terms of subjects
    having a vision of objects before they are concieved as such. He's not quite
    getting it and some how imagines that these trees and viewer are something
    other than the intellectual concepts Pirsig is talking about. You may recall
    from recent exhanges in the other forum, Pirsig points out that its not just
    a matter of the eye preceeding the brain in registering that external
    reality. That would not constitute a copernican revolution. No Pirsig is
    saying that subjects, objects and sense organs ARE intellectual
    interpretations and that none of those things are present in the primary,
    pre-intellectual awareness.

    There is a cultural bias that repeatedly causes this kind of
    misinterpretation. I'm sure you're sick of the term "blindspot", but there
    it is - again. I hope that my complaint might be easier to see this time
    just because this error was not committed my you or your friends. You can't
    take it personally or as a personal insult. I don't care who the author is
    and have already forgotten his name. Please, tell me you see it?

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 27 2005 - 01:24:16 GMT