Re: MD Pure experience and the Kantian problematic

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Mar 16 2005 - 17:04:58 GMT

  • Next message: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD Whither "direct," "pure," and "immediate"?"

    ANT: the MOQ is guaranteed 100% SOM free.

    To explain the (*real*) reason it boggles my mind I looked for a quote from Lila's child on Google and came across this, this is close enough to what i was looking for--its an old post by Dan. .

     DAN: In LC, RMP explains the evolution of his thought processes
    regarding SOM and whether it belongs in the MOQ so it seems reasonable to
    assume his thinking on the use of mind is also an evolving set of patterns
    and not something set in stone. It seems pretty clear to me that he does
    equate intellectual patterns of value with mind. He says they are equal.

    >
    >As the compiler of Lila's child, may i ask: How do you feel about the use
    >of
    >the term mind? Is it to be avoided as RMP suggests?

    I believe he says "avoided when possible." If someone insists on the MOQ
    giving a definition for intellectual patterns of value (even though we
    already know what intellect is) then perhaps it's not possible to avoid the
    use of mind, just as it's impossible to eliminate SOM.

    Erin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Mar 16 2005 - 17:44:01 GMT