From: Wim Nusselder (wim.nusselder@antenna.nl)
Date: Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:33:21 BST
Dear Marsha,
You asked 8 Apr 2005 04:35:14 -0400:
> Are you saying that at the individual level the static quality which one
> does not understand intellectually is equivalent to Dynamic Quality to
that
> individual?
I don't recognize that as a restatement of what I wrote. I hardly understand
what you mean.
I'm not writing about 'static quality' as something to be 'understood' (or
not) by individuals. It is not an object with a relation to an subject.
Static quality is the stability of a pattern. It is the 'patternedness' of
experience.
I was writing about being bound to (or stuck in) cultural (social and
intellectual) patterns of value. Social patterns of value are changed
(dynamized) by anything from 'above', either by intellectual patterns or by
Dynamic Quality directly. Intellectual patterns (i.e. a scientific method)
changes social patterns of value (i.e. a traditional way of printing books).
From the point of view of those social patterns of value there is no
difference between being changed by an intellectual pattern of value or by
Dynamic Quality directly. That's what I meant with 'Intellectual quality
represents Dynamic Quality from a social point of view'.
With friendly greetings,
Wim
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 08 2005 - 22:57:02 BST