Re: MD Access to Quality

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sat Apr 09 2005 - 21:13:53 BST

  • Next message: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Orpheus"

    On 9 Apr 2005 at 12:37, Platt Holden wrote:

    msh:
    Hear's the deal. No one knows if the laws of physics apply in every
    corner of the universe. Scientists assume they do in order to land
    spacecraft on distant moons. The fact they are able to land
    spacecraft on distant moons is, in turn, very strong evidence of the
    validity of their principles. If making these assumptions resulted
    in constant failure, the assumptions would quickly be changed. This
    is what is meant by the pragmatic acceptance of scientific
    principles.

    Is one's belief in God or Heaven arrived at in the same manner? Are
    such beliefs altered, or dropped, in light of contradictory
    evidence?

    platt:
    Your assumption is that the physical world is the entire world and
    that no evidence is permitted other than the materially measurable.

    msh says:
    Anyone who is able to actually register what I say knows that I make
    no such assumption. I've written about my knowledge of reality's non-
    physical aspects numerous times.

    platt:
    You are an acolyte in the faith-based religion called scientism.

    msh says:
    Since our argument involves the question of whether or not science is
    faith-based, your comment, as usual, does nothing more than assume
    your conclusion.

    platt:
    If anything, secular demonization of religious belief is fear-based
    and fear-driven by those who desperately wish to claim the moral
    high ground for themselves.

    < snip some name calling and off-point distractions re how some
    governments, for reasons of prower, not religion, brutalize large
    portions of their citizenry...>

    platt:
    Finally, given science's faith in the principle that the whole
    universe arose from nothing, resurrection seems infinitely
    reasonable.

    msh says:
    Please name a scientist who has expressed his or her faith in this
    principle. A verifiable quote in context would be nice.

    "Well, I didn't promise to provide the answers to life, the universe,
    and everything, but I have at least given a plausible answer to the
    question I started out with: What happened before the big bang? The
    answer is: Nothing." - Paul Davies, physicist, "What Happened Before
    the Big Bang."

    msh:
    This is your idea of a quote in context? Anyone who actually reads
    Davies' essay will see that one of his his arguments, based on
    quantum physics and cosmology, is that there is nothing unscientific
    about the idea that the universe arose from nothing. He writes:

    "Even if we don't have a precise idea of exactly what took place at
    the beginning, we can at least see that the origin of the universe
    from nothing need not be unlawful or unnatural or unscientific. In
    short, it need not have been a supernatural event."

    Since Davies' belief stems from his understanding of physics, and is
    supported by math, logical argument, and evidence, it is not a faith-
    based belief. Here's a link, for anyone who wants to read more than
    a quote out of context.

    http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/big-bang.html

    platt:
    Now, suppose you give me a verifiable quote of scientist who claims
    to know what happened before the Big Bang. :-)

    msh says:
    Sure. If you take the time to actually read the whole essay
    mentioned above, rather than just the last paragraph, you might be
    able to understand that it's perfectly reasonable to believe that
    nothing happened before the big bang. No faith required.

    However, my preferred answer is that the question is scientifically
    meaningless because the big bang singularity was the beginning of
    space and time. I don't think anyone can have a scientific opinion
    about what happened before the Big Bang. There is no BEFORE.

    What happened before the BB, what caused it? One of the reasons
    religions are invented, and keep going and going and going, is that
    most people are uncomfortable with not having answers to questions
    like these.

    Personally, I find an answer-less condition kind of interesting and
    peaceful at the same time.

    Best,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "The shadows that a swinging lamp will throw,
    	We come from nowhere and to nothing go."
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 21:18:03 BST