From: Mark Steven Heyman (MarkHeyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:40:07 BST
Hi Ham,
I truly do appreciate your fresh engagement below, and want to take
some time to think about what you've said..
Just a quick comment on this:
On 15 Apr 2005 at 2:24, hampday@earthlink.net wrote:
By the way, I'm still reeling from the remark you made to someone a while
back that my "quasi-religious" exposition of Essentialism is "giving
philosophy a bad name". Since I'm such a nice fellow, I'll refrain from
characterizing a certain other philosophy as "quasi-scientific".
msh says:
I may have used the term "quasi-religious" in referring to
Essentialism, but I belive it was dmb who said Essentialism is giving
metaphysics, not philosophy, a bad name. So, I'm only half-guilty
of this charge. So stop reeling or, at least, balance back to a
slight sway. :-)
Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
--
InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
"Thought is only a flash between two long nights, but this flash is everything." --
Henri Poincare'
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 15 2005 - 14:47:16 BST