RE: MD Access to Quality

• Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD ME-ME's"
• Maybe in reply to: Ant McWatt: "MD Access to Quality"
• Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Access to Quality"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ham, Sam and all:

Ham said to Sam:
Let's see what David's response is before delving too far into the rest of
this Quality levels thing. Thanks for the Copleston annotations and your
extensive analysis, Sam.

dmb says:
Seems I'm caught between Ham and Sam on this issue. I like to think of it as
a philosophical Ham Samwhich. Please pass the mustard. ;-)

I've been too busy to reply to all the posts that need a reply, including
several of Sam's. (I do this at the radio station while I'm supposed to be
working.) But I did send a long reply to Ham in this thread. As is often the
case with long ones, it hasn't yet appeared. And now I'm ready to head home.

Later,
dmb

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries -

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

• Next message: AlienWorkshop: "Re: MD ME-ME's"
• Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD ME-ME's"
• Maybe in reply to: Ant McWatt: "MD Access to Quality"
• Next in thread: David Buchanan: "RE: MD Access to Quality"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 18 2005 - 02:57:30 BST