From: Sam Norton (elizaphanian@kohath.wanadoo.co.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 12:25:34 BST
Hi Scott,
Another quibble.
> Scott:
> (Galileo had to recant because he claimed that heliocentrism was
> true, and therefore the Bible was false, which at the time was heresy. He
> would have been okay if he had just said that the heliocentric model was a
> better model for producing calculations.)
Please see my MD Galileo post from last Autumn, which touched on this. If
Galileo had evidence for backing up his assertions the church authorities
were prepared to back down. He didn't, so they didn't. (I'm drawing on
Feyarebend's discussion of it in his Farewell to Reason).
Regards
Sam
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 25 2005 - 15:11:31 BST