Re: MD Transubstantiation

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Apr 25 2005 - 15:56:56 BST

  • Next message: Charles Vanderford: "Re: MD Hume, Paley and Intelligent Design"

    ANT: Thirdly, as far as transubstantiation is concerned, the priest in a Roman
    Catholic Church after blessing the bread and wine, doesn’t qualify, for
    instance, the statement “this bread is the body of Christ” with the words
    “but only in the sense of a being a non-scientifically known substance”. He
    simply states “this bread is the body of Christ”. It is publicly given as a
    literal truth in the Catholic mass. As such, the doctrine of
    transubstantiation does imply that something that chemistry can measure in
    the bread has been changed and, in consequence, this is one clear example
    where ‘science and contemporary, non-fundamentalist theism are in conflict.’

     

    You must be a real hoot at a poetry reading. Everytime there is poetic use of a metaphor I can see you shouting out "Lies Lies all lies" you did not qualify your statement of "love is a rose" with "but only in the sense of a being a non-scientifically known substance". Science can have something to say to say about that metaphor but the person would look like an idiot and be missing the point of the poem.

    Erin

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 25 2005 - 17:53:46 BST