From: Arlo J. Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:15:15 BST
Ham, Mark, Everyone...
[Ham writes]
Mark, it's obvious to me that you enjoy the role of devil's advocate, and are
not about to make any concessions on the ID issue.
[and then Ham complains]
we are caught in an intellectual game of "prove me wrong". If we insist on
restricting ourselves to this kind of "one-upmanship", we are not philosophers
but analytical deconstructionists looking for the next idea to knock down.
[and then Ham admits]
Thanks for the references, Mark. But, you see, I'm really not interested in ID
criticisms because they won't change my mind, no matter how clever or rational
they may seem.
[which leaves Arlo wondering...]
Who's engaging in "philosophy" and who's "pontificating"?
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 26 2005 - 12:22:21 BST