Re: MD Transubstantiation

From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Apr 27 2005 - 06:22:18 BST

  • Next message: Erin: "Re: MD Transubstantiation"

    Well now that I have more time I thought I would explain where I was coming from when I wrote that. I was commenting on that yes a scientist COULD comment on how a dialogue of a mass could be clarified to fit a scientific viewpoint but shouldn't.
    I was using an analogy. I thought the proposal that a priest should clarify that his religious dialgoue is not from a scientific perspective as ridiculous as a demand that a poet must clarify that their poem is not from a scientific perspective. Should you demand a scientist giving a lecture on energy that he clarify that he is not using energy from a poetic or religious viewpoint?
     
    Whether a religous metaphor is recognized as a metaphor, (or a metaphor in a poem is recognized as a a metaphor, or a scientific metaphor is recognized as a metaphor) is a different matter and was NOT what I meant.
     

    I just read this on the net and thought it was interesting not sure yet if I agree with it b/c haven't completely wrapped my mind around it yet...it is from a physicist named May
     
    "Theories are generally formulated in mathematical terms, and it is difficult to see how it could be argued that, for example, F = ma "is" the motion of an object in any literal sense. Scientific metaphors possess uniquely powerful descriptive and predictive potential, but they are metaphors nonetheless."
     
     
     
    Erin
        
     

    Mark Steven Heyman <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com> wrote:
    On 26 Apr 2005 at 17:03, Sam Norton wrote:

    > msh:
    > Here's the unasked for clarification: Catholics who believe in
    > transubstantion are NOT being metaphorical, or even poetic.

    sam:
    The spirit of Mr Clinton hovers in the background: 'it depends on
    what the meaning of "is" is'......

    explanation>

    So even a catholic doesn't think that the bread has turned into human
    flesh. What Pirsig says in Lila is false - or, if I'm being
    charitable, seriously misleading.

    msh says:
    Well, it doesn't taste like flesh and blood, but it IS Christ's flesh
    and blood. At least that's what Sister Mary at St. Matthias told us;
    I still remember a room full of seven-year-olds going "Ewwwwwwww."
    But maybe she didn't read Aquinas.

    > Here's what Witt had to say:
    >
    > "If you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, stop talking
    > and ask, then listen..." - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-
    > Philosophicus

    sam:
    Good advice, (including for Pirsig) but I couldn't find the reference
    in my copy ;-)

    msh says:
    You're not looking in the right place. The quotation sort of
    appeared, miraculously, on my computer screen, last night.

    Later,
    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 27 2005 - 07:12:51 BST