Re: MD Access to Quality

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Apr 27 2005 - 20:51:09 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Hume, Paley and Intelligent Design"

    Hi All,
    The following letter from Jon was sent to me because for some reason he
    couldn't get it posted on the site. I will try to forward it to the site in
    this manner. Platt

     
    I am reading a lot of over-exaggeration. The true intellectuals will
    continue to be intellectuals however they see fit no matter who the
    president of the United States is. One post I read actually indicated that
    one day in the not-too-distant future the intellectuals were going to be
    herded into concentration camps. Absurd.

    Pat Robertson isn't evil or powerful. The United States upheld Larry
    Flynt's right to make fun of Pat. Enough said.

    Comparing the Christian church of today with the era of the Crusades is as
    stupid as comparing the 1972 Miami Dolphins to the 1999 Miami Dolphins. One
    had a perfect season, one didn't make it to the playoffs. They are not the
    same people having the same effect, and the world around them is vastly
    different.

    Yes, the church of today is insensitive to certain issues. But saying a
    group of people are damned is clearly different from rounding that group up
    and killing them. Just because the "official" position of the church is
    against certain intellectual endeavors doesn't change the fact that these
    endeavors will continue. Stem cell research will continue. I have faith in
    the dynamic drive of mankind. The people who have the most passion for
    ANYthing in life will find a way to do it. Despite the rampant Bush hatred,
    he is still the first POTUS to officially endorse stem cell research. That
    is evolution. To say otherwise is to deny the truth. Any progress is more
    moral than zero progress.

    Let us also point out that before the civil war, many Christians preached
    against the institution of slavery, and indeed helped many slaves escape.
    The abolitionists movement in America was almost totally Christian. And a
    predominantly Christian army liberated the Jews from the concentration
    camps. And the work of Christian missionaries this very day and age should
    be admired by anyone who values charity and compassion. These Christians
    visit kids in poor countries Iraq and even North Korea and visit the
    hospitals and gives the kids toys and I've seen the kids eyes lite up
    hearing that someone cares, that someone is doing something special for them
    and telling them a power greater than mankind cares for them. That is not
    the work of people intent of dragging society into the dark ages. Any moron
    with half a brain knows that only a sliver of a fraction of believers
    actually are TRULY anti intellectual, such as the Amish, shunning technology
    and so forth.

    When you talk about fanatics, your criticism is misplaced when you focus on
    suburban christains. These people are not going out murdering or
    evangelizing every stranger they see on the street. They don't chant
    "death to Muslims!" in church gatherings. In short, they are no cold
    blooded, or even warm blooded, killers. It seems to me that if you are
    going to worry about fanatical tendencies, you should first worry about
    the ones who take their fanaticism to the extreme of killing people. Or
    the extreme of advocating holy war.

    Do I disagree with Christians fixated on what other people believe, who
    think how much better off the world would be if they read the Bible? Yes, I
    also disagree with people who rant and rave about how much better off the
    world would be if people read Marx more often. Although they don't like to
    admit it, those who insist "you need to actually READ Marx!!!" often sound
    just as fanatical as the Christians. Let people be. Let them chose their own
    course in life. People must have the chance to fail greatly in order to have
    the chance to succeed greatly. Keep your bible and your Marx to yourself. If
    I become interested on my own accord, I'll join in. That's freedom of
    thought. Don't insult people for being poor. Or rich. And remember brains
    can be just as abusive as muscle. And as far as intellectual patterns
    dominating society, who decides which patterns are more moral? People have
    done some dumb things for the Christian church, sure. Giving up all their
    possessions and money by donating it to the church. Well, governments can do
    that to people too. "Moral economic
    theories" can do exactly the same thing, by persuading people to "donate"
    all their personal savings to the community. After all, isn't it more
    moral for society to have a joint savings account? We can vote on who gets
    to divvy out the most money to whom. See the problems? People can and WILL
    pervert "moral" economic theories just as people pervert aspects of their
    religion. Only maximization of private freedoms can keep such dangers at a
    safe distance. If you want to live in a bubble, fine. Box yourself away, and
    you should damn well have that right. You wanna volunteer at the Red Cross
    or the student socialist club, go for it. The point is, we already have the
    right to do that. That's worth being thankful for.

    People are just GOING to get fixated on certain things from time to time.
    Singling out the church as a source doesn't have much value to me. People
    who are fixated on winning America Idol can be just as mean and
    unrealistic as a bible-thumper. And why not attack professional sports if
    you're really serious about attacking static, unintellectual patterns
    which people get fanatic about? Football fans can way crazier than people
    in church. Whether or not a given team wins a given game is something
    people CARE about and it's all a game. Why not bash people who watch
    sports? Are they not brainwashed fanatics? Are the athletes themselves not
    powerful? Do they not hold, in some instances, as much power as Pat
    Robertson? Is it okay to idolize someone who throws balls but not okay to
    idolize someone who died on a cross? Don't they both talk with hatred of
    the opposing teams, but that's all it is. Trash talk. "Screw that team!
    May their fans go to hell." My friends, that can NOT be truthfully compared
    to ideologies that involve actual KILLING. Yes, some christians are brain
    dead zombies. So are some sports fans. So are some Marxists. Better to have
    a society of brain dead dolts watching TV and drinking beer than going out
    and killing in the name of some murderous ideology! Think, people! Indeed.
    And next time you want to bash patriotism, think about bashing team spirit
    too. JON

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 27 2005 - 21:14:05 BST