RE: MD Pirsig's conception of ritual

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 21:23:00 GMT

  • Next message: Matt the Enraged Endorphin: "Re: MD NAZIs and Pragmatism"

    Sam, Wim and y'all:

    The numbered assertions below are Sam's. As he points out, much of what
    Pirsig says about ritual can be found in chapter 30 and I think this takes
    us into some pretty interesting territory. Its not just about religious
    ritual, but even more compelling, it is about mysticism and insanity, about
    static patterns and DQ, about the relationship between the social and
    intellectual levels. That chapter breaks open so many fascinating anti-SOM
    things that I'd hardly know where to begin, so I'm glad that Sam started it.
    I'll insert some comments after each of Sam's assertions....

    1. Ritual is the static latch of the social level; it functions to preserve
    dynamic breakthroughs.

    DMB says: Right, but its a little more complicated than that. In chapter 30
    Pirsig spends some time discussing the relationship between static and
    Dynamic Quality where ritual is concerned and he points out some differences
    between East and West and between different periods. Sometimes static
    rituals properly encase DQ and sometimes "these interpretations become like
    golden vines that cling to a tree, shut out its sunlight and eventally
    strangle it."

    2. Ritual preserves a particular society in existence. It contains and
    reproduces those patterns of behaviour which maintain that society above the
    biological level, and which give that society its own identity. This has
    maintained human societies in existence for at least tens of thousands of
    years.

    DMB says: Right, but its important to remember that often Pirsig is using
    the word more broadly than is usually expected. Its not just the religious
    rituals of the churches that create and preserve the social order. He
    includes Monday mornings at work, payday, grocery shopping and a huge range
    of other such "rituals".

    3. Ritual is the source of the intellectual level. Intellectual principles
    are derived from reflection on ritual practices.

    DMB says: Again, I think this needs to be more precise. And I think this
    gets at a very important issue; the connection between the social and
    intellectual levels. He says, "The mythos is the social culture and rhetoric
    which the culture must invent before philosophy becomes possible. ...it is
    the PARENT of our modern scientific talk. This 'mythos over logos' thesis
    agreed with the MOQ's assertion that intellectual static patterns of quality
    are built up out of social static patterns of quality." This is consistent
    with the point he makes with respect to Descrates, where he should have said
    that "17th century French culture exists, therefore I think, therefore I
    am". He not exactly saying that intellectual principle come from the
    contemplation of rituals, but that the mythos, which includes rituals in a
    big way, is what allows us to think at all. Language is also a key feature
    of the social level. Imagine trying to do philosophy or science without
    first having a language. Its impossible to even imagine how it would be
    possible, no?

    4. Religious rituals enable social-pattern dominated people to progress to a
    higher level of awareness. Freedom from the social level comes from mastery
    of those rituals, not their rejection (ie 'putting them to sleep').

    DMB says: I think you've got two distinct ideas here. The first one, I
    think, is about the role of ritualistic religion in the modern West.
    Intellectuals tend to view such things as ignorant and backward and so they
    are unmoved by the mass and things like that. But for people whose worldview
    is still dominated by social values, by the mythos of their culture, ritual
    can serve as a sign post pointing to DQ. I guess its fair to call this a
    "higher level of awareness", but I think its important not to confuse this
    kind of transcendence with moving up to the next static level. In other
    words, these religious rituals are supposed to point to and reveal
    unpatterned DQ, not intellectual static patterns. The second idea, that
    freedom comes from the mastery of ritual, is where the difference between
    East and West really comes into play. It is the Zen monk who can best find
    the Dynamic within the static patterns because "unlike the Greeks, the
    Hindus in their many thousands of years of cultural evolution had paid
    enormous attention to the conflict between ritual and freedom. Their
    resolution of this conflict in the Buddhist and Vedantist philosophies is
    one of the profound achievments of the human mind." In the West such issues
    never really made it to the level of a philosophy and remained a social
    level mythos sort of thing. In the West both ritualistic religion and
    scientific objectivity have all but blinded us to DQ. So the conflict was
    not resolved properly at all. Pirsig speaks to this in chapter 30 by
    pointing out that SOM can't see the difference between mysticism and
    insanity, etc..

    5. This resolves the paradox of ritual and freedom, for both reflect dharma
    - Quality.

    DMB says: OK. Both ritual and freedom reflect dharma, but so does everything
    in the universe, so I'm not sure how useful the assertion really is. "Dharma
    is beyond all questions of what is internal and what is external. Dharma is
    Quality itself, the principle of 'rightness' which gives structure and
    purpose of all life and to the evolving understasnding of the universe which
    life has created." It is very much tied up with the original idea of "Rta",
    the cosmic order of things. Its the oldest idea in the world, that the
    physical order and the moral order of the universe is the same thing. "But
    within modern Buddhist thought DHARMA becomes the phenomenal world - the
    object of perception, thought or understanding." This is a rich enough vein
    that we could spend lots of time on this single issue.

    If I had to guess what you're getting at, what you're trying to imply, I'd
    say no way. Attending mass does not make you free. It is not likely to
    precipitate a DQ experience. The institutional religions of the West seem
    hell bent on preventing evolution and transcendence. I'm sure Pirsig is not
    suggesting we Westerners become church goers again. Enough for now.

    Thanks for your time,
    DMB

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 21:24:14 GMT