Re: MD Transubstantiation

From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Apr 30 2005 - 07:34:54 BST

Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Transubstantiation"

Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Primary Reality"
Maybe in reply to: David Buchanan: "MD Transubstantiation"
Next in thread: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Transubstantiation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Re-send

OK Scott - I do still believe the conflict really is there, but you
clearly understand my point about physics and the quality of
scientific explantion (given a chance in the modern world).

I fear that allowing people, even you, to talk about science in 19th
century shorthand, risks spreading / perpetuating misunderstanding -
hence my sensitivity.

Ian

On 4/29/05, Scott Roberts <jse885@localnet.com> wrote:

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Transubstantiation"
Previous message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Primary Reality"
Maybe in reply to: David Buchanan: "MD Transubstantiation"
Next in thread: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Transubstantiation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 30 2005 - 08:55:36 BST