Re: MD Science vs. Theism: Where's The Beef?

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Thu May 05 2005 - 14:13:16 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD the ideology of capitalism"

    Hi Ian,

    Oops.... you know me, just being cranky, trying to keep the
    conversation lively...

    And I'm usually the one telling people to lighten' up.... don't I
    look silly!

    Til later,
    Mark

    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "My love life is terrible. The last time I was inside a woman was 
    when I visited the Statue of Liberty." 
    - Woody Allen
    On 5 May 2005 at 15:25, ian glendinning wrote:
    Ha, Mark,
    And in "spell-checking and corecting" the quote you extracted, you
    miss the point.
    I really did mean to mis-spell enemy as enema.
    (The other main thread - humour - chill, lets at least have a laugh
    whilst we're about it, and not forget that many a true word is spoken
    ... or we'll all end up in the asylum.)
    Hee Hee
    Ian
    On 5/5/05, ian glendinning <psybertron@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Hi Mark,
    > 
    > First a major caveat,
    > My blog style is "unfettered" by any rules or convention (other 
    than
    > my own). I am happy not to make coherent sense, provided I have
    > logged something I can come back to later myself. One reason I post
    > thoughts there, has always been I know I could not explain them 
    here
    > - easily. One aspect of that - not just incoherent-sense, but 
    jargon
    > too - just suit my mood as I brain dump the thoughts - so I'm not
    > worried about those aspects of your "criticism" - honestly.The only
    > rule on my blog is that I thought it significant, and I thought I
    > knew what I mean at the time. Some slightly more coherent points
    > appear also in the Enlightened Caveman thread referred to an linked
    > earlier.
    > 
    > That said - I'm glad Ant pointed MoQ-Discuss at a post I wouldn't
    > have made to this forum directly. Because I do sincerely mean what
    > the central point says I believe - and any help to (a) articulate
    > it, or (b) deny it, is genuinely welcome.
    > 
    > And if anybody "offended" by it wants to respond - please start
    > knowing I knew it would be "offensive", ans say as much a couple of
    > times in the post, but that was simply secondary to my more
    > important aim. Offence acknowledged, but not aimed deliberately at
    > anybody. Breaking eggs, is the expression.
    > 
    > The main point lest it was missed - in plain words - is quite 
    simply
    > ...
    > 
    > I do not see (never did see) any point or obligation to argue
    > "against" theistic arguments.
    > 
    > Sorry - not running scared - just focussing my attention where I
    > believe it will be most productive to a higher quality future for
    > the planet.
    > 
    > Bye
    > Ian
    > 
    > On 5/5/05, Mark Steven Heyman <markheyman@infoproconsulting.com>
    > wrote:
    > > Hi all,
    > >
    > > Ant quotes from Ian's blog:
    > >
    > > "Oh my god, this is truly awful. The logical positivist memeplex
    > > reinforces the religious memeplex. Science has unwittingly been
    > > it's own worst enemy."
    > >
    > > msh says:
    > > Although I know Ian prefers physics to religion for pure
    > > explanatory power, this quotation is to me a great example of 
    how,
    > > by using exotic terminology, someone might, to an ear less
    > > skeptical than mine, come across as being profound when all they
    > > are being is at best provincial, at worst obscure.  The quote
    > > seems to suggest that LP and religion are equally useful systems
    > > of investigation, that science has been caught in its own lie and
    > > is hoist by its own petard. This obvious falsehood is given an
    > > aura of truth by the use of the sophisticated sounding 
    "memeplex."
    > >  Must I really run to Dawkins in order to understand a sentence
    > > that, with slightly more effort, could have been written using
    > > plain ol' English?
    > >
    > > Apropos to this thread, there is a huge difference between the
    > > epistemological foundations of science and religion, and to
    > > suggest otherwise is, as I like to say, pure confusion.
    > >
    > > Just my fiftieth of a dollar, and I don't expect any money back.
    > >
    > > Mark Steven Heyman (msh)
    > > --
    > > InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    > > Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since
    > > 1983 Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    > >
    > > "Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly; Man got to sit and wonder
    > > 'why, why, why?'  Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land; Man got 
    to
    > > tell himself he understand." - Kurt Vonnegut, Cat's Cradle
    > >
    > > MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    > > Mail Archives:
    > > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > > Nov '02 Onward  -
    > > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html MD
    > > Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    > >
    > > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    > >
    > >
    >
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 05 2005 - 14:22:12 BST