Re: MD Primary Reality

From: Arlo J. Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Tue May 10 2005 - 16:32:39 BST

  • Next message: Michael Hamilton: "Re: Re[2]: MD Probably Silly Questions.."

    Platt,

    [You wrote]
    There have been a number of conservative contributors to MOQ Discuss over the
    years. Like me, they have found plenty in Pirsig's philosophy to support
    right-wing ideas, the most notable being the MOQ's view that freedom is the
    highest value of all.

    [Arlo replies]
    I couldn't let this one go, as it is fairly good evidence of Rovian dialectic
    tactics, namely the subtle rhetorical pairing of "right-wing ideas" and
    "freedom" (and of course, the oppositional pairing it implies of "left-wing
    ideas" and "non-freedom").

    I and likely ALL the "leftist, secularist, non-right, non-Christians" on the
    list are also motivated by the MOQ advocacy of "freedom". But both "left-wing"
    and "right-wing" ideology per se is nothing by absurdly hypocritical to claim
    to be "for freedom".

    For example, "Freedom", for the right, is strictly a marketplace phenomenon.
    Freedom to bring goods to market, to pay unregulated wages, to move factories
    to maximize profit, etc. The underlying support for this is the view that
    individuals are fully free to purchase or not purchase goods, to find new work,
    to sell their labor as they see fit, and are unmanipulated by advertising in
    their purchasing decisions.

    Outside the marketplace, there is no "freedom" in right-wing ideology.
    "Morality" is heavily regulated by promotion of Victorian, Judeo-Christian
    social codes. The MOQ is used only to justify rigorous and uncritical
    acceptance of social patterns.

    The left views the "freedom of the marketplace" as inherently able to only
    create "freedom" for a few, while denying it to the many (reminiscent of the
    later part of the 19th century). The underlying support for this is the view
    that individuals are not fully free to sell their labor, to find new work, or
    to make unmanipulated purchasing decisions. Thus, "freedom for the many" comes
    at a cost to "freedom for the few".

    However, the "left" has not moved to empower the many, only to manipulate their
    disempowerment to strengthen its political clout. "Freedom for the many" has
    become a product of government giveaway.

    And all the while, people who could be effecting true change, real change,
    Quality change :-), in the system sit back and uncritically adhere to their
    "ideology"... which is usually the one that they have some power-vesting
    within.

    Arlo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 10 2005 - 19:47:53 BST