RE: MD Primary Reality

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat May 14 2005 - 21:16:59 BST

  • Next message: Mark Steven Heyman: "Re: MD Access to Quality"

    Howdy MOQers:

    Ant McWatt said to Platt:
    ................................................................."the MOQ
    view of freedom is different from the capitalist view of freedom." This
    difference is implied by Pirsig's observation in Chapter 17 of LILA: "The
    conservatives who keep trumpeting about the virtues of free enterprise are
    normally just supporting their own self-interest. They are just doing the
    usual cover-up for the rich in their age-old exploitation of the poor." The

    latter is definitely not an MOQ sentiment.

    dmb says:
    Right. I think we can all agree that so-called capitalist economies exhibit
    a certain dynamism, but let's not forget that money and the marketplace is a
    social level convention. The freedom it allows is a social level freedom,
    the freedom to go shopping and to sell things. And I think that liberals
    object to this idea Not because we're opposed to selling and buying freely,
    because many of us would like to score a big bag of kind buds, but rather on
    the grounds that free-market freedom is a very small notion of freedom, one
    that tends to cheapen the human spirit by commmodifying our every dream and
    wish. Free-marketism in the actual world amounts to a gleeful endorsement of
    consumer culture and all the various forms of exploitation that it
    represents. To the extent that free-market arguments only justify what has
    always been the case, the rich using the poor, then it is an intellectual
    rationalization of tradition rather than a genuinely intellectual system. It
    can get tricky when social level values get all dressed up in intellectual
    clothes, but the naked reality can be exposed with a little effort.

    Platt said:
    Few conservatives have time to contribute regularly to this site because
    they are fully engaged in doing and have little time left over for talking.

    Ant McWatt replied:
    Christ, this made me laugh. You do know that lies make Baby Jesus cry,
    don't you Platt?

    dmb says:
    Yea, Platt. Stop telling ridiculous lies. You're making the sweet Baby Jesus
    cry. Baby Jesus hates you!

    Ant continued: .......The truth about the matter is that serious left-wing
    people tend to be better quality thinkers, more tolerant, more caring, more
    liberal, more generous with their time. These higher quality sentiments are

    reflected by the MOQ so that is why anyone on this Discussion group
    promoting conservative ideas looks very much like a crank. The great thing
    about Pirsig in this respect, is that despite being very much against
    right-wing ideology (being one of the original hippies in the 1950s), he
    still took the best element of traditional conservative economic thinking
    (namely genuine free markets - not the government supported ones we have in
    the West) and incorporated them in the MOQ. A true pragmatist.

    dmb adds:
    I think one can see a broad/narrow split in the liberal/conservative
    debates. The liberals want the UN, international law and international
    cooperation in matters of national security while conservative favor a more
    unilateral and nationalistic approach, for example. The liberal pluralists
    argues with the "English Only" crowd. The civil rights protestor is at odds
    with racial supremacists and seperatists. In a million cases, we can see
    that liberals come down on the wider perspective, the global perspective
    while the conservatives tend to be defending a particular nation, a
    particular race or religion, a particular culture or worldview over all
    others. And its no accident that conservatives are protecting thier own
    culture, nation and religion. Its a view that doesn't or simply won't walk
    in the other guys shoes. And if I may remind you, this idea fits quite
    nicely in with the idea that Fascism is nationalism on steroids. The danger
    of this narrow vision is that it tends to disrespect everyone else, everyone
    outside the particular culture or religion. Liberalism and pluralism and
    internationalism, on the other hand, rests on the idea of equality of rights
    regardless of all those other loyalties, but in terms of individual rights
    and the rights of nations.

    And is there any doubt that the present administration has taken the narrow
    view at every opportunity?

    Platt asked Ant:
    Pirsig attempted to "combine" capitalism and socialism and proposed
    intellectual control of the economy in the name of "fairness?." That's
    news to me. Can you supply some quotes to support that conclusion?

    Ant McWatt replied:
    Yes, I can. For instance, see the following paragraphs from Chapter 17 of
    LILA:
    ............."It is not that Victorian social economic patterns are more
    moral than socialist intellectual economic patterns. Quite the opposite.
    They are less moral as static patterns go."

    "That's the whole thing: to obtain static and Dynamic Quality
    simultaneously. If you don't have the static patterns of scientific
    knowledge to build upon you're back with the cave man. But if you don't have
    the freedom to change those patterns you're blocked from any further
    growth."

    dmb adds:
    I like fairness much better than unfairness. I have a hard time
    understanding people who fell otherwise. What kind of person objects to
    fairness? Don't we all, from the time we are toddlers, know the feeling of
    outrage that occurs when confronted with unfairness? Isn't that something we
    all know intimately and constantly? I don't understand the attitude that
    would mock the "bleeding hearts" or endorse social Darwinism. I think these
    people had brutal fathers or something. I'm going to go way out on a limb
    here and say that fairness is a good thing and anyone who is against it is
    one sick puppy.

    I recently learned that 4% of Americans are socio-pathic, meaning they have
    no conscience, no remorse, no compassion, no humanity. Maybe that explains
    the Republican leadership.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat May 14 2005 - 21:24:17 BST