RE: MD Primary Reality

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Wed Jun 15 2005 - 14:00:48 BST

  • Next message: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Primary Reality"

    Hi Allen

    On 14 June Allen Barrows wrote:

    > Bo: I have done nothing else but whatever twist one makes tries, it
    > always comes out as saying that mind comes first, i.e: the idealist
    > part of the S/O aggregate.
     

    > Hello Bo again, This is quite a disorganised jumble.

    Yours or mine? ;-)

    Seriously Allen, some of us have been at this discussion for ages
    and been through every possible and impossible angle to the
    MOQ, then to start again with newcomers from rock bottom is too
    much. I'm sorry if this sounds off-putting, but I feel that you are a
    bit in league with one Squonkstail whose holy grail was intellect
    and his mission to defend it against my effort to take it down to its
    proper place. The MOQ mends things by by wrestling the
    metaphysical "M" from SOM leaving its S/O the intellectual value
    level of its own system

    The resistanse to the SOL is SOM's firm grip and this rests with
    with the inner dialogue we all keep going with ourselves or with
    imaginary opponents. This makes us believe that there is an
    inner forum where all this takes place. In SOM this forum is
    called MIND and the dialogue is called THOUGHTS . If one
    transfers this directly to the MOQ the said forum becomes
    INTELLECT and the dialogue becomes intellectual PATTERNS.

    But it can't be transferred directly: Intellect is not any subjective
    inner arena, SOM's inner/outer AS A METAPHYSICS is rejected!
    In the ancient pre-intellectual - social level - era the inner voices
    were perceived as gods, their forebears or demons talking to
    them, without the ancients seeing it as taking place in their
    minds, THERE WAS NO MIND/MATTER BEFORE INTELLECT.
    (not shouting, just trying to imitate "italics")

    At the biological level there is no language and no dialogue, but
    surely a capacity (among the mammal species at least) for
    imagingination, a dog twitching in sleep has a dream experience
    of chasing a cat ;-) Finally. As said intellect's S/O is the higest
    value and there is no need to (not possible either) drop its
    vocaulary of "in my mind" and "thinking" or anything, if only the
    MOQ context is - um - kept in mind.

    Yours most friendly, but admonishing

    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 15 2005 - 14:09:22 BST