Re: MD MOQ in time and space

From: platootje@netscape.net
Date: Sun Jul 03 2005 - 08:56:44 BST

  • Next message: platootje@netscape.net: "Re: MD MOQ in time and space"

    skutvik@online.no wrote:

    >I agree with Mike, but maybe in a sense that he won't approve of.
    >Time and space - the scientific kind - are intellectual patterns and
    >because the intellectual level is SOM (stripped of its
    >metaphysical qualities) we will of course keep them. I would like
    >to see anyone capable of "removing" them ;-)

    Yes, I've seen some discussions in which SOM gradually developed as the intellectual level, and to be honoust, I have my doubts with that. But anyway, it does not influence my PoV towards space

    >
    >But the non-scientific time and space did not come into being
    >along with intellect? Pre-intellect people surely followed the
    >heavenly bodies' rhythm and certainly called this rhythm
    >something. Regarding space I guess they more or less took it as
    >given, there was no question of where the universe ends and
    >such science-induced problems.

    They had an experience and called it space... is that what you're saying?

    >
    >SOM is abandoned when the "M" is taken over by the MOQ, but I
    >hope you don't mean that the S/O divide is to be abandoned,
    >because that is the intellectual level IMO? Geometric space as
    >different from ordinary space? You must elaborate.

    Yes, the S/O division must be abandoned or else you keep intellectualizing about MOQ in a SO-way.
    By geometric space I mean dimensional space I guess. That what's commenly understood as the universe, without substance in it.

    >
    >Yes, as a metaphysics SOM is contradictory, but as a static value
    >it is great.

    But we can't say on a metaphysical level, let's get rid of it, but we keep it as static intellectual pattern because we have no alternative.

    >> But
    >> from the MOQ point of view there isn't even a need for geometric space,
    >> because there is no substance to take up space.
    >
    >Even if I agree that inorganic patterns aren't substance this gets a
    >bit too weird.

    'Too weird' has never been an argument against a philosofical theory ;-)

    >I would rather say that time and space in themselves (not the
    >scientific - maybe this is your "geometric" - kind) are as much
    >inorganic patterns as particles and forces.

    Whereas I think time and space are the results of the SO PoV that krept into every organism in the organic level and above.

    Reinier.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
    As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

    Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

    New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
    Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
    Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 03 2005 - 09:00:56 BST