Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court

From: Platt Holden (pholden@sc.rr.com)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 12:57:29 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Our Immoral Supreme Court"

    > > Hi Mark M:
    > > So a human happening is unique, has a name, and is
    > > aware. To me that's a pretty good description of
    > > "self."
    > >
    > > Mark 4-7-05:
    > > Hello Platt, you have been selective here have you
    > > not? You have left out the 'happening' bit.
    > > I am getting that spinning feeling.
    >
    > Hi Mark M:
    > Did you not see "happening" as in "human happening"
    > above.
    >
    > Mark 5-7-05:
    > Yes i did read it. Am i correct in thinking that you
    > have changed your view of self then?

    First you say I left out something that was there. Then you say you knew
    it was there all along. Now you ask if I've changed my view of self when I
    said that you gave a good description of self. Sometimes I wonder if we
    speak the same language.

    > > Platt:
    > > Me too, which means I hold someone like Pirsig in
    > > higher regard than others.
    > >
    > > Mark 4-7-05:
    > > Which means you hold the MOQ in higher regard than
    > > other intellectual patterns.
    >
    > Platt:
    > Yes. But I though we were talking about the quality of
    > unique human happenings.
    >
    > Mark 5-7-05:
    > Intellectual patterns play a part in unique happenings
    > but there are also social patterns too. You may value
    > the social patterns of a person but not value the
    > intellectual patterns or vica versa.

    Agree. That's the basis of the ad hominem fallacy.

    > When discussing intellectual patterns it can be a good
    > thing to bias those rather than use a name.
    > Maybe i am being a bit nit picky here!?
    > However, i bet if i hit you with some intellectual
    > statements Karl Marx made but did not tell you who
    > made them, you would be fooled into regarding him
    > above some others? Maybe not!? ;)

    I doubt it. :-)
     
    > Asking question is not intellectual inquiry? That's a
    > new one on me.
    >
    > Mark 5-7-05:
    > Children can ask questions all day long and learn a
    > great deal very quickly. I agree this is healthy
    > intellectual activity. Maybe you should keep it up?

    Nice to know you consider me a child. Did it occur to you I ask questions
    because some of your thoughts aren't clearly expressed or make little
    sense to me?

    > Platt:
    > Sorry. Can't agree to ignore the English language.
    >
    > Mark 5-7-05:
    > I would not ask you to do so Platt.

    But you did. You asked me to agree to using i instead of I when referring
    to myself.

    > Platt:
    > Why more difficult in the U.S than, say, Britain? Can
    > you give some
    > examples of the "best" that they need to be inspired?
    > Rock and roll
    > perhaps?
    >
    > Mark 5-7-05:
    > 'Let it be, let it be, let it be, let it be, there
    > will be an answer, let it be.'

    See what I mean about making sense?

    Best,
    Platt

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 13:35:52 BST