From: Arlo J. Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 09 2005 - 15:26:14 BST
Platt
You wrote to MSH:
> No, I'm not saying ANY argument not endorsed by the Supreme Court is
> without value. You're following in Arlo's footsteps of non sequiturs.
You appeal to this concept of "non sequitur" whenever you can't address a
challenge. Perhaps, again, you should look up this term in a dictionary, and
stop using it is a distraction from having to answer for lapses in logic on
your part.
Although, I do realize that this type of "distractive" discouse in endemic of
talk-radio argumentation techniques.
Arlo
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jul 09 2005 - 15:30:51 BST