Re: MD MOQ in time and space

From: platootje@netscape.net
Date: Mon Jul 11 2005 - 09:31:42 BST

  • Next message: ian glendinning: "Re: MD Barfield is Wrong"

    Hello Bo,

    >Yes they are metaphysics, but are they intellectual patterns?
    >Stone Age people surely made up theories about their reality, but
    >as this was before intellect .... not intellect.

    They perceived their reality, but did they make op theories? If they did then intellect started earlier then we think, if they didn't, well then they didn't.
    I think they didn't.

    >Descriptions come in grades. To say that the sky is blue is a
    >innocent one, but to say that it is blue because a Blue God paints
    >it was the social "metaphysics" description, while saying that is it
    >because sunlight gets refracted by ...etc is an intellectual
    >"metaphysics" description

    If you replace the word 'intellectual' in your last sentence, by 'scientific' I would agree.

    >Language (manipulation of symbols) can be used for all kinds of
    >descriptions - intellectual ones too! But to declare symbol
    >manipulation to be intellect is just not correct. Intellect is the
    >value of the Description/Reality distinction ...or the Symbol/What
    >is symbolized distinction

    If you regard it that way then you have to conclude SOM as the intellectual level.

    >Good! You sound dynamic enough to see the SOL-ution. I badly
    >need a "lieutenant" ;-)

    I understant some of your arguments, but still I do not agree with your statement that SO(M) IS the intellectual level. MOQ is not reality or a next level. The only real absolute reality is Quality.

    >IMO Phaedrus was an individual who started from SOM's
    >premises (intellect before the MOQ) and pursued them to the
    >bitter end and beyond, then had the Quality insight. After that his
    >premises was there. Now, all levels utilize the values under them
    >for their own purposes and the MOQ definitely uses intellect for
    >all it's worth so you're right ...intellectualizing isn't bad per se.
    >One thing though, the MOQ is not a level, but in its relationship to
    >intellect some level characteristics are apparent.

    The levels are just catagories made up by one person. The whole Quality/Values idea is a very powerfull one. I feel that too much attention goes to defining levels and relationships between them.

    Kind regards,
    Reinier.

    __________________________________________________________________
    Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
    As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

    Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

    New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
    Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
    Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 11 2005 - 10:09:27 BST