Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Society

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Wed Jul 13 2005 - 00:13:45 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Society"

    On 12 Jul 2005 at 13:49, Platt Holden wrote:
    >
    > msh 7-6-05:
    > I didn't formalize it because it is obvious, or should be. When
    > someone dies as a result of being refused life-saving treatment,
    > they are being deprived of life. If the government allows this
    > to happen without showing legal cause, then the government has
    deprived
    > someone of life without the due process of law.

    platt 7-10-05:
    If someone dies as the result of his neighbor refusing to donate
    blood and the government fails to force the neighbor to give blood,
    then the government has deprived someone of life without due
    process. Hard to believe that anyone would make such an argument.

    msh 7-10-05:
    No one is making that argument. We're talking about taxes, not
    blood. Governments, through due process of law, collect taxes to
    provide any number of things: police, fire, and other emergency
    services, roads, sewage systems, water systems. Not to mention
    less critical services such as schools, libraries, museums, parks.
    My argument is that, unless life-saving health services are included
    in this list, our government permits the deprivation of human life
    without the due process of law.

    platt 7-12-05:
    That's precisely the argument you're making because once you go down
    that road of forcing others by law to "save lives," there's no
    stopping. Thankfully there's no such law and thus your due process
    argument is absurd.

    msh 7-12-05:
    Your slippery slope has proved to be non-existent. We already
    collect taxes for police, fire and EMT services, and thus are
    "forcing others by law" to save lives. Why should a tax-based system
    for providing life-saving medical services be regarded differently?

    In fact, since most police work is about protecting property, it
    could be argued that a tax-based health system that will positively
    affect millions of lives is an even higher moral priority than most
    police services.

    What is your MOQ-based moral justification for tax-based police and
    fire services? And why does it not apply to life-saving medical
    services?

    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    "Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak 
    minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call 
    on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness 
    even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more 
    approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." 
    -Thomas Jefferson 
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 13 2005 - 00:14:53 BST