From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jul 16 2005 - 20:46:14 BST
I had sent you a reply on Thursday but it never showed up. I resent it four times yesterday after getting this tongue-in-cheek post from you and again twice today. I am going to try and break into two parts...to see if that helps it get through. Also I was quite irritated when I wrote it by your obnoxious attitude towards me but with Mati's suggestion am going to try to clean up the language. So this will a little bit nicer one ,,,probably a good thing it didn't go through.
MARK assumes: As I don't expect a public reply to my request for attributed quotes,
please allow me to opine.
ERIN: I had already sent a reply so try not so assuming so much about me because your assumptions tend to be wrong
MARK: My question to Erin was sort of tongue-in-cheek, as one who knows my
writing style and tone might expect. It's pretty clear to me that
she is referring to things I've said, not to stuff from the distant
past. That's why I asked for quotes. I doubt she'll provide them,
but if she does I'll have some fun cleaning her clock.
ERIN: the post was NOT referring to you Mark why that is so clear to you I will leave that to you and your ego to assume
MARK: I recently said to Ham and Platt that I expect them to provide
evidence and argument for their political and religious opinions,
when challenged. And I've suggested that if they are unwilling or
unable to do so, they should post THOSE opinions to a non-
philosophical website. I don't see this as asking anyone to leave;
it's just a request that all contributors respect the nature of the
list.
ERIN: I ignore a lot of your political bickering/ usually just skim through it quickly (pretty easy because it is the same stuff over and over again) so didn't even see that. My post was not directed to that comment at all.
MARK: For me, the ideas expressed
by ignorant reactionaries like Vogel, and right-wingers in general,
are so easy to expose as foolish, it's a pleasure to keep them (the
right-wingers) around. Truth comes out, and Quality is served.
ERIN: see I don't get this...it is talked about how it is more helpful to stick to issues than to this right-left party kind of crap....yet you continue to do it. Also I know you want to lump me into the conservative 3 group and thus not get to know me as an individual but instead just generically apply stupid little political stereotypes .....but last presidential election i voted democratic and the one before that I voted for Nader. You don't know anything about me so please stop trying to make assumptions about me because your horrible at it.
When I first joined this site I used to go off on Platt (e.g. talking about the stupidity of Bush) and my political opinions are closer to you than Platt. Since then Platt and others have influenced my thinking about politics but not in a way that I actually agree with him about politics :-) (maybe a little more moderate) It is more that I have grown respect for how he handles himself with such arrogant people as yourself. Also his viewpoint is so different from I like to hear the other side of things.
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 17 2005 - 01:10:59 BST