From: Paul Turner (paul@turnerbc.co.uk)
Date: Thu Jul 21 2005 - 12:04:32 BST
Ham,
I'm almost certain that this statement (below) is not from ZMM or anything
else Pirsig has written. Looks like something Scott would say.
>"Applied mathematics is not the same as pure mathematics, and
>calculating is applied mathematics. I do think that mathematical
>thinking would not have arisen without more general S/O thinking, but
>in itself, in the act of thinking, it is not S/O."
Ham said:
>I think we are long overdue for an exploration of Consciousness itself --
>not in the collective or historical sense, but as the uniquely human
>process
>we all depend on to convert sensory awareness into our tangible experience
>of the physical world.
>
>Or, is that too much for a sometime dissenter to ask?
Paul: No, it's not too much to ask, it just begs the question right from
the off, i.e. you make the assumption that proprietary intellectual
consciousness is something that is the direct result of a certain level of
biological sophistication, that e.g. a human born into isolation or at any
time or place in history would think and perceive the same way we do.
Regards
Paul
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 21 2005 - 12:35:22 BST