Re: MD MOQ and The Moral Society

From: Mark Steven Heyman (markheyman@infoproconsulting.com)
Date: Sun Jul 24 2005 - 22:54:15 BST

  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Intellect as Consciousness"

    On 24 Jul 2005 at 15:22, Arlo J. Bensinger wrote:

    On education:

    [Platt]
    2) If high schools educated to higher standards than is now deemed
    acceptable, the diploma could be much more meaningful. (If pigs could
    fly . ..:-)

    msh 7-24-05:
    Many public high schools are excellent. Why? Because they are in
    neighborhoods with a tax-base to adequately compensate teachers,
    provide computers, books, lab equipment, and other educational
    materials, as well as to provide safe, clean, and uncrowded
    environments for learning. So, rather than privitizing education and
    playing the vouchers game, why not shift some of the tax base from
    wealthy communities to poorer ones? Or, why not dip into the state
    and federal tax base in order to bring the public education system of
    poorer communities into line with public schools in the wealthy
    communities? Why are we asked to be satisfied with great public
    education for kids from wealthy families, while kids from poorer
    families go without?

    These are rhetorical questions, of course. The drive to dismantle
    public education has no more to do with providing better education
    than Bechtel's privitization of water in Bolivia had to do with
    providing people with affordable water. It's all about limiting an
    essential societal service to those who can afford to pay whatever
    they're charged for it, and to hell with everybody else, even if this
    results in the destabilization of society. This is a violation of
    MOQ morality.

    As for supporting education after high school, I think it is in
    society's best interest to pay the freight for anyone whose career
    objective is directly connected to the betterment of society, GPs and
    pediatricians and heart surgeons, not liposuctionists; public
    defenders not corporate lawyers; architects who will design schools
    and libraries and hospitals rather than Hearst Castles and
    Rockefeller Centers. The principle is sound; the details can be
    worked out.

    Anyone agree?

    Mark Steven Heyman (msh)

    -- 
    InfoPro Consulting - The Professional Information Processors
    Custom Software Solutions for Windows, PDAs, and the Web Since 1983
    Web Site: http://www.infoproconsulting.com
    MOQ.ORG  - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward  - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 24 2005 - 23:35:20 BST