From: Matthew Stone (mattstone_2000@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 21 2003 - 11:19:10 GMT
Hi
I agree, and would add this: When the experience of
art is analysed in a SOM framework we are clearly an
integral part of the equation. We are the subject,
the painting is the object. In the MoQ the notion of
the self is necessarily deconstructed, and 'we' become
less of a clear-cut part of the 'experience'. The
difficulty in conceiving of 'yourself' within the MoQ
(that is, the SOM model of 'yourself') means that an
MoQ analysis of an 'experience' of art seems less of
an intense event in you.
--- johnny moral <johnnymoral@hotmail.com> wrote: >
Hi Zykaine,
>
> I think all things are experienced through an SOM
> framework. Experience
> implies a SOM framework, it implies a subject
> experiencing an object. The
> more the subject feels like a subject and
> experiences the object as an
> object, the more intense the experience. When seen
> from an MOQ framework
> though, the passion goes away, it is just a quality
> event with the patterns
> of value being created on both ends. It's hard to
> feel passionate when you
> see yourself as just a pattern of value.
=====
From Matt.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Feb 21 2003 - 11:19:38 GMT