Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths

From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 11 2005 - 20:29:17 BST

Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Enlightenment or Revelation"

Previous message: Paul Turner: "MD Snakes and Ladders"
In reply to: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths"
Next in thread: David M: "Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> I'm fine with nature dividing. What I am objecting to is the notion that
> there is something "undivided" that exists ontologically prior to that
> dividing. Meanwhile, the MOQ puts down intellect (with respect to DQ) by
> saying it divides. That is also what I am objecting to.

DM: I have read the philosopher Roy Bhaskar and he argues extensively
for the need for an underlying unity for stuff like communication and
causality
to be possible. And hey does not contradictory-IDENTITY imply a unity in
difference?

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Enlightenment or Revelation"
Previous message: Paul Turner: "MD Snakes and Ladders"
In reply to: Scott Roberts: "Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths"
Next in thread: David M: "Re: MD Self-Evident MoQ Truths"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 12 2005 - 00:54:28 BST