Re: MD Why the MOQ is not perfect...

From: Kevin Perez (juan825diego@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Aug 29 2005 - 18:10:28 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD The MOQ conference hoax"
  • Next message: Matt Kundert: "RE: MD Rhetoric"
  • Next message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD Essentialist and anti-essentialist"

    Does MOQ.org intend to develop the MOQ?
     
     
    Kevin Perez

    David M <davidint@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
    Hi all

    Of course some people may think the MOQ is more than
    nonsense but not yet fully formed. I would place myself
    in this position. If it were fully formed why discuss it at
    MOQ.org. For one thing I think that we need to better
    understand how an MOQ science would look compared
    to a SOM based science. And what political implications
    does this change in metaphysics imply? Of course, I accept
    Charles Taylor's asserion that you cannot do without
    explicit metaphysics and values.

    DM
    __________________________________________________
    Do You Yahoo!?
    Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
    http://mail.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 29 2005 - 19:30:04 BST