RE: MD Pirsig the postmodernist?

From: David Buchanan (DBuchanan@ClassicalRadio.org)
Date: Sat Mar 01 2003 - 20:57:51 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD more than one intellectual level"

    Matts and all:

    Matt the EE said:
    I think Pirsig's fundamental move is to redescribe reality, not in terms of
    material or ideas, but in terms of value. Technically, there is no
    material in the MoQ. There are only inorganic patterns of value. We
    formally thought of these things as material objects, but the redescription
    does away with that. Pirsig would redescribe neural states and mental
    states into valuing states. But I don't read Pirsig as _reducing_ us to
    valuing states. I read him as saying that some old problems disappear when
    you do this (though new ones will certainly arise).

    DMB says:
    While its true that matter or substance is re-described in the MOQ as
    inorganic patterns of values, I don't think we can go so far as to say the
    MOQ denies the existence of material. Pirsig's attack is upon a METAPHYSICS
    of substance, not substance itself. He's trying to overthrow scientific
    materialism, the stance that objective physical reality is the bedrock of
    the world. As to the identification of neural states and mental states, in
    spite of the qualifications Rorty might make, I think this is inescapably a
    materialist postion. I think Pirsig's analogy of the levels within a
    computer works well hear. The neural activity in the organ we call the brain
    is biological, but the mental states that are associated with it are either
    social or intellectual. The phrase "mental states" is vague enough to avoid
    such distinctions and could even be used to refer to sleep or coma, but I
    think we have to presume that when we talk about the mental/neural
    distinction we are talking about the mind/body problem. And if I understand
    Pirsig correctly, he is saying that mind is not a product or property of
    brains, even if the mind can't exist without it. As per the computer
    analogy, the mind is like a novel and the brain is simply where the novel is
    stored. They are two distinctly different things. Just as there is a
    difference between paper and ink on the one hand, and fiction and philosophy
    on the other. You get the idea.

    Thanks.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Mar 01 2003 - 20:57:37 GMT