From: johnny moral (johnnymoral@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:35:39 GMT
Wouldn't "UNTHINKING" actions have to qualify as biological? Or maybe
unthinking INTER-actions are social (sex, as I said earlier, is really
between two halves of a single human unit so remains biological), unthinking
actions within one person are biological. Calling social thought like
myths, religious rituals and social conventions 'unthinking' because it is a
sort of instinctual following of patterns certainly makes it easy to define
thought as the fourth level. Platt calls it thinking, me and others call it
'thinking about', because we can't see how we could have developed the
social level without thinking. But maybe the intellectual came a lot sooner
than we think, and is responsible for the development of the social level?
Though they were few and far between, intellectual thoughts probably created
the static social latches like the myths that most other people then
unthinkingly socially followed (and still do)?
_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 03 2003 - 04:36:06 GMT