From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sun Sep 11 2005 - 23:15:54 BST
Hi Paul
Interesting. Yes for Heidegger thinking is an activity ascribable to being
and human being. Inseparable like DQ and human being. Same stuff.
SQ is of course something that can be held at a distance, a sort of
stretch separation. If Scott's arguments against using the anti-essentialist
term are valid, he needs to drop the use of essentialism for the
same/opposite
reasons.
This is fun/painful.
David M
>
> "Recall that conventionally, think and Being are considered not just
> contraries, but contradictories - thinking is the contradictory of
> non-thinking, and non-thinking is Being...In other words, Heidegger is
> affirming the identity of these contradictories....The superb irony, of
> course, is that here we see Heidegger deconstructing the first phase,
> logocentric rationalism; and [later] we shall see the Heideggerian sort of
> logocentrism likewise deconstructed!" [Magliola, Derrida on the Mend,
> p74]
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
> http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 00:04:04 BST