Re: MD The intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:15:20 BST

  • Next message: David M: "Re: MD The MOQ implies that there is more to reality than DQ & SQ."

    Hi Platt --

    > Looks like there were hard feelings after all. Sorry about that. As for
    > understanding your philosophy, I respectfully give up.

    I can assure you there are no hard feelings on my part. Whatever you think
    I've said or done to snub you is a misconception. (Anyway, let's let
    bygones be bygone.)

    It disturbs me even more that you have "given up" on my philosophy. I'm not
    sure whether this decision is a result of concepts that are unsupported by
    the MoQ or whether it's my failure to articulate Essentialism in a
    meaningful way. I suspect the latter.

    You have been a strong advocate for individualism vs. the collective, which
    is an ideology sorely missing in Mr. Pirsig's philosophy. I hope you at
    least understand that I've constructed Essentialism from the individual
    perspective, and so individual freedom is its moral cornerstone.

    I think the major obstacle I'm facing -- and it applies to all I've
    discussed this with -- is that people don't see the significance of
    proprietary awareness in their worldview (i.e., the fact that everything
    exists except the conscious subject.) Once you realize that, you are struck
    with the truth that reality is an "otherness" to you. Like a bolt out of
    the the blue, you are suddenly hit by the fact that you are excluded from
    this reality. It is not yours, it's an other that you can only know in
    fragments. And you, yourself, are isolated from the "beingness" that it
    possesses and you don't.

    The natural reaction is to either "panic" or believe that something is askew
    in your thinking. You immediately review the situation in hope of finding
    some way to reclaim your lost self. You may go back to your religious
    roots, as many philosophers have, looking for some dogma that will restore
    your faith. Or, you may choose to work it out intellectually and come up
    with a metaphysical solution. I've tried them both, and my conclusion is
    that metaphysics holds the answer.

    Metaphysical theories can't answer the specifics as Science does or provide
    the anchor of a faith-based belief system; but they can lead to a concept of
    reality whereby your finite existence has meaning and purpose in the overall
    scheme of things. It does no good to latch yourself to someone else's
    theories, although they can guide you in this direction; ultimately, we each
    have to come to our own philosophy and discover our own meaning in life.

    Well, that's my "sermon for the day". I sincerely hope you'll reconsider
    your decision and allow me to explain anything you find puzzling or
    illogical about my philosophy. That would be helpful to both of us.
    Actually, I'm struggling with the MoQ to the same end and, despite what
    others may think, I see much value in the basic Quality concept.

    Thanks for supporting the individual and free-choice, Platt, and I look
    forward to the possibility of redeeming myself with you.

    Essentially yours,
    Ham

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:56:02 BST