Re: MD The intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: hampday@earthlink.net
Date: Fri Sep 23 2005 - 02:06:41 BST

  • Next message: Arlo J. Bensinger: "Re: MD Individuals and Collectives"
  • Next message: Case: "Re: MD Terrorism"

    Reinier --

    I know you're busy with your daughter and friend(s), etc., but when you have
    a moment, I'd like you to read this excellent analysis of Cusa's ontology.
    (I've copied this particular section from a much larger on-line document.)
    Since it speaks of the "potential", "possibilities" and "actuality" of
    Creation, it may be germinal to our efforts.

    Tell me what you think.

    "Cusa begins from the assumption that the sensible world is finite, and
    therefore must exist from another (ab alio). Because the world cannot fix
    its own limits, it must have something fixing its limits. Think of it this
    way: a finite being cannot step outside of finite being and set boundaries
    around finite being, otherwise he would not be finite. But finite being
    necessarily has a limit. So, there must be something OTHER than finite being
    for the finite being to have limits, a being outside the limits who can set
    the limits.

    "This 'other-from-which-the-world-exists' is a se, that is, exists from
    itself. It is the boundary-maker for finite being, and creator. Since
    created things only exist from another, this creator does not exist from
    another, but from himself. Existing from itself, it is necessarily eternal,
    and because it is eternal, it is necessarily invisible. Visible things are
    necessarily temporal, Cusa argues. As one commentator points out, this is
    not apologetic. We can think of possibilities that Cusa doesn't try to
    refute. He is assuming the Creator-creature distinction, and then trying to
    fill out the features of a metaphysics based on creation.

    "One of the things that he discovers here is a doctrine of possibilities and
    actuality, the notion of 'actualized possibility', or what he called
    'possest', a combination of Latin 'posse', (able, possibility) and 'esse',
    (being, actualization). What does he mean?

    "First, everything that exists necessarily is able to be what it is. This
    leads to a consideration of actuality itself. Actuality must itself exist,
    since it is presupposed by anything that actually exists. If actuality did
    not exist, then nothing could actually be. Things are; therefore, actuality
    exists. Just as nothing could be white without the existence of whiteness,
    no things could be without the actuality of actuality. (The Platonic tenor
    of the whole argument is obvious. Patience. It gets better.)

    "Yet, if actuality exists, it is able to exist, because nothing can exist
    unless it is capable of existing. But it would not have the possibility for
    existing unless something else existed, and that something else is
    possibility itself: 'without possibility nothing is possible'. If actuality
    is able/possible to exist, then possibility must also actually exist.
    Neither possibility and actuality cannot be prior to the other. If
    possibility were prior to actuality, then possibility would not ACTUALLY
    exist; but if actually were prior to possibility, then it would not be
    able/possible to exist. Therefore, the two are co-dependent, and must be
    equally ultimate, equally originary. In fact, possibility exists eternally,
    and since it cannot be prior to actuality, actuality also exists eternally.
    This possible-actuality or actualize possibility is God. God is different
    from all other beings in being that being that is the actuality of all
    possibility: 'He alone is, actually, everything of which 'is able to be' can
    be predicated truly. In contrast to Aquinas, Cusa does not describe God in
    terms of essence and existence, but in terms of possibility and actuality."

    Let me know if you want the Internet address for the entire essay.

    I'll wait for your insightful response. ;-)

    Essentially yours,
    Ham

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 23 2005 - 02:41:30 BST