Re: MD The MOQ implies that there is more to reality than DQ & SQ.

From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Sun Sep 25 2005 - 16:27:45 BST

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "Re: MD Terrorism"

    Hi folks

    Anyone wish to contest that there is moreto reality than DQ & SQ as I am
    saying?
    But is there more to reality than experience? Perhaps not.
    I am saying to make sense of reality and experience, we need to look
    beyond what we experience to postulate both the world (something we can only
    experience in part) and the capacity of DQ to keep flooding SQ into the
    world that we
    can barely imagine let alone experience. nb alchemists loved to think of
    be(com)ing as
    a fountain/font). Now this does not imply that there is SQ that exists that
    is not contained
    within experience. Rather I suggest we recognise that when we try to narrate
    an evolutionary
    cosmology (bunk to Matt's restrained ambitions) we need to talk about all
    the SQ and DQ
    that has evolved and interacted in the cosmos in a non-human realm of
    experience.
    I think the MOQ is postulating, in itsre-jigof causality, the idea that all
    SQ-SQ or SQ-DQ
    interaction is experienced interaction. I would suggest, though, that DQ-SQ
    seems be
    more conscious than SQ-SQ that can via repetition fall into what we call
    unconscious
    interaction.

    DM

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "david buchanan" <dmbuchanan@hotmail.com>
    To: <moq_discuss@moq.org>
    Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 3:00 AM
    Subject: Re: MD The MOQ implies that there is more to reality than DQ & SQ.

    > Hello brave Rebecca and all MOQers:
    >
    >>Rebecca said:
    >>Because if he did, in fact, equate experience with reality then I'm going
    >>to have to disagree with him but I'm not sure that's what he's doing. And
    >>is that experience a physical experience or could it be a mental
    >>conception, like a fantasy world created in fiction? When we stop reading,
    >>does that fantasy world cease to exist? Does it exist even when we ARE
    >>reading?
    >
    > dmb says:
    > Its good to see you posting. I wondered if you would. Anyway, here's my
    > two cents...
    >
    > As I understand it, the MOQ says that experience IS reality and there are
    > two categories of experience, static and Dynamic. For a fuller
    > explanation, I'll ask you to look at my latest post in the "Rhetoric"
    > thread where I compare the MOQ's static/Dynamic split to the Classical
    > Indian Buddhist version of these two categories.
    >
    > Later,
    > dmb
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
    > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
    >
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 25 2005 - 16:43:35 BST