Re: MD MOQ and phenomenology

From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 19:39:50 BST

Next message: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD The MOQ implies that there is more to reality than DQ & SQ."

Previous message: David Zentgraf: "Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of"
Next in thread: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD MOQ and phenomenology"
Reply: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD MOQ and phenomenology"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Mark

I'd be interested to discuss this topic.>

> Mark:
> Buddhist process ontology, which is anti-essentialist,
> is based upon a metaphysics of Universal flux. I'm
> aquainted with this and Western substance
> ontology/metaphysics, as well as phenomenological
> percpectives.
> I doubt if you have any knowledge of any but one of
> these Ham?

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: Matt Kundert: "Re: MD The MOQ implies that there is more to reality than DQ & SQ."
Previous message: David Zentgraf: "Re: MD Consciousness/MOQ, definition of"
Next in thread: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD MOQ and phenomenology"
Reply: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD MOQ and phenomenology"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 30 2005 - 19:46:00 BST