Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: Ant McWatt (antmcwatt@hotmail.co.uk)
Date: Mon Oct 03 2005 - 19:09:34 BST

  • Next message: Mladen Duvnjak: "MD reply to Gav 2"

    On September 22nd, Ant McWatt stated:

    >To cut to the chase, if SOM was the intellectual level of the MOQ then
    >that would mean the MOQ itself is part of SOM or that the MOQ is a
    >non-intellectual static pattern (such as a social one). Both options
    >seem nonsensical to me.

    Bo Skutvik responded on September 23rd:

    That the MOQ is "out of intellect", "beyond intellect", "non-intellectual"
    is plain.

    Ant McWatt asks:

    OK, Bo, if you think the MOQ is not an intellectual map of reality nor a
    social pattern, where does it exist within reality? Where is its
    metaphysical place?

    Best wishes,

    Anthony.

    “Well! I’ve often seen an SOM without an MOQ,” thought Alice; “but an MOQ in
    an SOM! It’s the most curious thing I ever saw in all my life!”

    (Apologies to Lewis Carroll and the Cheshire Cat).

    .

    _________________________________________________________________
    MSN Messenger 7.5 is now out. Download it for FREE here.
    http://messenger.msn.co.uk

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 03 2005 - 22:17:07 BST