Re: MD reply to Gav Lila it's beyond our current technology Captain Kirk

From: Michael Hamilton (thethemichael@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 04 2005 - 16:09:15 BST

  • Next message: gav: "Re: MD reply to Gav Lila it's beyond our current technology Captain Kirk"

    Hello to you, the mysterious Mr. Spears,

    On 10/4/05, Mr. Spears <dspears@toucansurf.net> wrote:
    > i was watching the big christmas lecture on television last week and
    > all the people who had two cars and houses rather sheepishly were asked
    > to stand up and be counted. they numbered in the mutitude and the
    > message of the presenter not me i hasten to add i was not there but was
    > hocked to see that this two car business and house business requires
    > five earths to sustain.
    >
    >
    > quid pro quo facto. dq DQ here says, most evolutionary, moral static
    > pattern of response is, drop the car.

    Hear hear, I couldn't agree more. However, I've been finding it hard
    to follow and understand your posts so far. Would it kill you to take
    a little more care over your phrasings to make sure we can understand
    your ideas? (which I think I like)

    I'm not trying to be a spelling and grammar Nazi (this is the internet
    after all!), but especially in a philosophical discussion it's
    important to make sure that people can at least understand you
    (especially also as English isn't everyone's first language here).

    Regards,
    Mike

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 04 2005 - 16:37:52 BST