Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)

From: mark maxwell (laughingpines@yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 05 2005 - 21:31:15 BST

  • Next message: Rebecca Temmer: "Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"
  • Next message: Michael Hamilton: "Re: MD The SOL fallacy was the intelligence fallacy (was Rhetoric)"

    Case:
    But I would maintain that there is only one subject in
    SOM and that would be me.

    Mark:
    Hi Case, this may be plausable in an atemporal
    analysis but temporal slices generate multiplicity.
    Therefore, there are multiple subjects in SOM.
    Indeed, SOM is way off base from the get go.
    The Buddhist doctrine of Universal flux and quantumn
    mechanics support the same notions.

    Case:
    You may have your own SOM where the subject is you but
    I think any SOM that includes a plural for subject is
    way off base from the get go.

    Mark:
    This may be logically unsound Case re: temporal
    slicing? You may wish to consider correspondance
    between CaseT1 and CaseT2 and CaseT...n for example?

    Mark

                    
    ___________________________________________________________
    How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
    snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 06 2005 - 00:39:00 BST