Re: what is of particular interest to me is the words of yours: MD bullshit

From: Mr. Spears (dspears@toucansurf.net)
Date: Mon Oct 17 2005 - 01:57:21 BST

  • Next message: Weknowitwell@aol.com: "Re: MD Any help"
  • Next message: Mr. Spears: "MD Re: M23. + = D The 4th level. Renamed?"

    On 15 Oct 2005, at 16:50, Arlo J. Bensinger wrote:

    > Hi Gav,
    >
    > Well... I'm sympathetic, and the beauty of the thing is that you are
    > free to
    > engage and disengage in dialogue as you see fit. I do believe that
    > there is
    > benefit in discussing, openly and critically, the social-level patterns
    > (government, capitalism, labor) that are our modern culture.
    >
    > The main reason I feel this way is that the underlying problems all
    > originate in
    > dialogic constraints and manipulations. The only way to solve the
    > problem, as
    > Pirsig described in ZMM, is to "expand the dialogue". The reason for
    > all the
    > "junk" being produced and consumed (in ZMM) was related to the fact
    > that the
    > dialogue had no provision for Quality, no way of seeing that the
    > relationship
    > between those who produce and what they produce effects the quality of
    > those
    > who consume and what they consume. That is true for materials, ideas,
    > and
    > politics.
    >
    > This is why I have such a hard time with "status quo" thinking. Pirsig
    > is not a
    > "status quo" guy, he was not content to let the "junk" go on without
    > being
    > openly, and dialogically, critical of it. Right now we have a modern
    > system in
    > which there is still so much "junk", in materials, ideas and politics.
    > And yet
    > so many seem so vehement to make sure that no critical challenges
    > whatsoever be
    > brought into the dialogue (and when I say dialogue, I am talking about
    > the
    > cultural dialogue).
    >
    > The so-called "liberal/conservative" dichotomy is merely one example
    > of this
    > "junk". But to ignore the dialogue completely, to drop out, is not an
    > option to
    > me. It may very well be the best option for you. Hopefully, the
    > dialogue of the
    > MOQ is large enough that we can both discuss what is of particular
    > interest to
    > each of us personally.
    >
    > Arlo
    >
    >
    > MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    > Mail Archives:
    > Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    > Nov '02 Onward -
    > http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    > MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
    >
    > To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    > http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
    >

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 17 2005 - 04:09:36 BST