From: ian glendinning (psybertron@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 17 2005 - 13:07:21 BST
Mike,
I was a bit slow coming back to this thread too.
You interjected to Bo
"Perfectly sound logic. But see how it was not evident ..."
This is my recurring mantra "logic isn't everything".
You highlighted (and I latched onto) the linguistic aspect elsewhere.
I also like the "having one's cake and eating it" metaphor you've been
trading with Bo. It's a good statement of the (static) pattern of
quality which embodies the means of it's own (dynamic) evolution.
However much "Quality" stands above the MoQ, or any conceptualisation,
it's (pragmatic) definition cannot be anywhere else but in the MoQ.
Ian
On 10/15/05, Michael Hamilton <thethemichael@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings Bo (Scott and Ian mentioned),
>
> I've been rather slow in replying to these crucial questions, largely
> because my ideas about the 4th level are still very fluid ...
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 17 2005 - 14:11:37 BST