From: Erin (macavity11@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 13:48:24 GMT
LOL funny response Case... well he may not read your
posts but don't fret because you and he are ONE.
--- Case <Case@ispots.com> wrote:
> This bit of doggerel was inspired by Mark's post so
> it is included as a
> footnote:
>
> Bang! Bang! Maxwell's Silver Hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> We've been informed that all I say,
> To Mark will be considered dead.
> No more will Maxwell take the trouble
> To read my words cause they befuddle
> The MoQ he's calcified
> And all dissenter vilified
>
> Bang! Bang! Maxwell's Silver Hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> But it's all the same since it's pretty clear;
> Mark never caught a word I said.
> "That's Shite, you cross dressed," he loved to
> exclaim
> But why he was angry he'd never explain.
> I don't "accept MoQ as it is," "for Him"
> And so I'm consigned to Maxwell's bin.
>
> Bang! Bang Maxwell's Silver Hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> No more can I assume that what I've written Mark has
> read.
> For him hence forward DQ's confined
> To the Static content of his own mind
> This devotee of terms uncertain
> Upon my thoughts has drawn the curtain.
>
> Bang! Bang! Maxwell's Silver Hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> From vexing thoughts Mark's shallow mind
> Has turned its tail, has run, has fled
> And the steersman that guides him Cybernetic
> A Homunculus trapped in a land pathetic
> Where concepts like Chaos and Harmony
> Are sullied in Mark's Nth ontology
>
> Bang! Bang! Maxwell's Silver Hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> Henceforth Mark will have no truck
> With thoughts that turn his face to red.
> But it seems it's not a mortal sin.
> I'm not alone in Maxwell's bin.
> The range of thought he renders naught
> Come, too, from Bo, Ham, Platt and Scott.
>
> Bang! Bang! Maxwell's Silver hammer
> Has come down upon my head
> No more will Mark's mind dare to travel
> Down roads it's not already tread.
> And he can revel in Static bliss
> Claiming DQ is only his
> He owns the MoQ at last
> With hammer and head shoved up his ass.
>
> Case
>
>
> [Mark Maxwell wrote:]
> I'm deleting all posts composed by Scott Roberts and
> 'Case' without reading
> them and have been doing so for a few days now.
> (Joining Bodvar 'loonybins' Skuttlebutt, Platt,
> 'String 'em up' Holden, Ham
> 'The con-descender'
> Priday, etc.)
> I don't have time to engage with those who don't
> accept the MOQ.
>
> (Now and again i will remind Skutvik he's out of his
> tree, but that's really
> not for his sake, but for the sake of those newbies
> he jumps on with his,
> 'unka Bodvar' routine. These people are quite
> understandably taken in by
> 'soft lads' charm and self imposed air of fake
> authority. These people don't
> understand him to be the liar, charlatan, and
> paranoid self delusional many
> of us have had the misfortune to witness 'explode'
> once or twice over the
> last few years.
> However, This person has to be dealt with carefully,
> because the next
> explosion could be serious and i don't believe
> anyone wishes him harm. It's
> tricky, but that is the way it is until nature takes
> its course and relieves
> the MOQ of a festering boil.)
>
> I simply wish to engage with people who hold similar
> views to my own because
> i want to try and develop a few ideas which begin
> with the MOQ.
>
> So, if you want to help, i value your contributions
> more than words can say.
>
> If you don't accept the MOQ as a working philosophy,
> then i don't want to
> waste your time.
>
> The threads i need help with are the 'Secondary
> ontology' thread and the
> 'Chaos and its role in Evolution' thread. Both these
> threads are almost the
> same. I would like to put secondary ontology to bed
> if poss, but i have had
> some positive feedback (no pun intended) in private
> and to a lesser extent
> in public, so i wish to think about it some more.
> The aim is to write an essay which puts this stuff
> out there for others to
> read if they find it of value.
>
> If, as seems likely, very few people currently
> contributing to the MD
> either, 1. Do not accept the MOQ as is or 2. Accept
> the MOQ but find no
> value in thinking about secondary ontology and
> feedback, then so be it. It
> is what it is!
>
> All the best everyone,
> Mark
>
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
> How much free photo storage do you get? Store your
> holiday snaps for FREE
> with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
>
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
> instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
>
>
>
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archives:
> Aug '98 - Oct '02 -
> http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> Nov '02 Onward -
>
http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
> MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the
> instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 15:23:18 GMT