Re: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game

From: Arlo Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Tue Nov 01 2005 - 21:09:23 GMT

  • Next message: Arlo Bensinger: "RE: MD Any help"

    >My question is this.
    >
    >Is all fair in love and war, water off a duck's back ... or should we
    >be rejecting the kind of direct personal negative statements in Mark's
    >post as unacceptable, however incidental they are or however well
    >intentioned the central point or aim ?
    >
    >I'm genuinely curious as to the concensus.
    >Ian

    I guess my only comment would be the motivation to publicly proclaim that
    "I'm not reading so-and-so". One can make the decision to ignore all of
    Arlo's posts, and Arlo would have no hard feelings. However, if one decided
    to email the group and say "I ignore Arlo!", Arlo would wonder what the
    point of that was.

    What he stated, in other words, is the obvious. All of us select and filter
    our emails, have certain interlocutors we read and others we ignore.
    Doesn't this go without saying. Should I publish to the list the names of
    those who I deem "ignore worthy"? Should we all? For what point?

    Certainly, Mark, yourself, all of us should freely read and respond to
    those posts we value. We do anyways. Who can disagree with that? Some of us
    value collusion, some of us value disagreement, some pragmatics, some
    epistemology. We all filter. We all make value judgements. That's life.

    So, the point of Mark's email, the only one that I can see, was to publicly
    say "I think so-and-so is unworthy". And the intent of that is subtle
    disparagement. Were I to post a public statement that "I will no longer be
    wasting my time reading Ian's delusions that there is common ground between
    Arlo and Platt" :-) doesn't that smack of nothing more than my needing to
    say to the group that I think Ian is an idiot? What would be the point?
    Does Ian need to know I am ignoring his posts? Does the group need to know
    that I am ignoring Ian? Why?

    Don't get me wrong, I take no offense at Mark's post (maybe because I was
    not among the list of shunned... yet), I just question the value in the
    motive. The underlying act is something we all do all the time. But, why
    declare a List of the Shunned?

    Arlo (who publicly declares that Ian is NOT on his List of the Shunned)

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 01 2005 - 21:20:29 GMT