RE: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game

From: Case (Case@iSpots.com)
Date: Wed Nov 02 2005 - 14:53:16 GMT

  • Next message: Michael Hamilton: "Re: MD Rhetoric"

    Ian,
    I don't think you are suggesting censorship but I relate this back to the
    discussion Platt and Arlo are having about advertising. I for one don't
    question anyone's right to free speech but I am often terribly disappointed
    by how they exercise it. Too often it is not so much a question of
    fundamental rights as a question of bad taste. Unfortunely ignoring bad
    taste does not seem to make it go away. People can say whatever they want
    but ulimate this reflects on the speaker more than the spoken of. I suggest
    there is a direct proportion between the vehemence of the attack and the
    inability to formulate a reasoned response.

    Arlo,
    Exactly, do we really need to know who is ignoring whom or why?

    Matt,
    Nice thoughful post. I found your analysis of why incivility rules to be
    right on target. Reflecting on some of the posts I have made over the past
    few months, perhaps some have been overly harsh. I thought the whole point
    of this group was to discuss ideas but we all identify profoundly with our
    thoughts and it is tough not to take things personally or to respond rudely
    sometimes. On a couple of occasions I have regreted things I have said to or
    about Platt, Ham and especially Pirsig. To anyone I have personally offended
    with the possible exception of Mark I sincerely apologize. I deeply respect
    people like Ian who seek a concensus and Platt and Ham who are thoughtful
    about positions I disagree with but who are articulate in defending them.
    I am always more attentive to ideas I disagree with and tend to spend more
    time on them. I offer up ideas in the hope that they will be thoughtfully
    critiqued. In some ways being mindlessly attacked is at least more fun than
    being thoughtfully ignored.
    It would be nice if all these discussions were all civil but I really do
    enjoy the exchanges here. Even Mark makes me think, just in along different
    lines. I would prefer if someone thinks what I say is "shite a go go" that
    they provide some details as to why. But if all they can articulate is a
    viseral reaction that's ok too. At least they found whatever I said
    stimulating. But if someone is going to call me out, I will respond in kind.
    I like to think it is possible to find Quality in "Yo' Mama" agruements,
    too.

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 02 2005 - 15:41:46 GMT