Re: MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level

From: David M (davidint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: Thu Nov 03 2005 - 18:46:25 GMT

Next message: David M: "Fw: MD Rhetoric"

Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Hamilton: "MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"
Next in thread: David M: "Re: MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Matt: The only truth it seems to me we need to
>> take from the subject/object divide is that the first-person point of
>> view
>> is the way we think."
>

DM: I think Heidegger spent his entire career inventing a way to think
without that assumption. So as far as our normal language is concerned
you're
right. Take a look at Heidegger if you fancy an alternative.

MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

Next message: David M: "Fw: MD Rhetoric"
Previous message: hampday@earthlink.net: "Re: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Hamilton: "MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"
Next in thread: David M: "Re: MD Re: Quality, subjectivity and the 4th level"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 03 2005 - 21:30:10 GMT