Re: MD Calling all atheists

From: skutvik@online.no
Date: Sun Nov 20 2005 - 15:34:42 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: MD Two Theses in the MOQ"
  • Next message: skutvik@online.no: "Re: MD FW: The intellectual level and rationality"

    Hi Platt

    Your post was a relief from being chased up and down the MD
    main street by our village idiot ;-)

    18 Nov. you wrote:

    > It's been awhile coming, but Bo has brought us to the crux of the
    > matter-- naturalism vs.spiritualism. Although Pirsig vehemently denies
    > any connection between his metaphysics and the divine, the creative
    > power of DQ--an indefinable, mysterious force -- resides at the heart
    > of the MOQ.

    The naturalism vs spiritualism controversy is just one of the many
    platypi that emerged from SOM (intellect before it became a
    static level). Pirsig suggests that the MOQ ends them all - yes,
    we certainly agree here.

    > In an earlier post, Bo referred again to what I and Arlo long ago
    > agreed to in spite of of our political differences, namely, that
    > philosophy is about revealing underlying premises. As if on cue, Bo
    > opined that the subject/object premise delineates the intellectual
    > level, that "gods behind everything" premise defines the social level.
    > Following Bo's focus, one sees that the other Quality levels are
    > framed by other, distinct premises. (Inorganic level -- particles,
    > biological level -- DNA) Standing above all levels is the premise of
    > an indefinable "Quality"

    Quite a coincidence that I "heard" the cue. One comment though:
    The MOQ premises aren't all indefinable, its the very level
    system. I call it the Quality Reality above/beyond its own
    intellectual level. What is a metaphysics if not a meta-reality?

    > A closer examination of the premises of the lower levels reveals their
    > utter inability to show cause for emergence of the higher ones. For
    > instance, at the inorganic level the hidden premise is from nothing
    > arises everything. At the biological level the buried premise is
    > non-life produces life. Other sequestered premises at these
    > "naturalistic" (scientific) levels are: from randomness comes
    > fine-tuning, from chaos emerges information, from unconciousness
    > appears consciousness, from no- reason springs reason. In other words,
    > one damn miracle after another!

    Total agreement!

    > Once you admit to some mysterious force pulling rabbits out of hats,
    > you're into the realm of the spiritual no matter what you call it --
    > DQ, elan vital, prana, psychism, God -- whatever. And once your into
    > that realm, you're into discovering who you are because, as Bo pointed
    > out, "Pirsig used something more than intellect or - better -
    > something more used Pirsig."

    I guess we agree, only that "spiritual" can't well be added to the
    list of grand concepts that makes for MOQ-like metaphysics
    ("Beauty" a shining example) because it evokes its "corporeal"
    counterpart.

    > I believe that "something more" is using us now, drawing us -- often
    > in spite of stubborn static selves and our load of cliche cultural
    > garbage -- toward betterness. For me, Beauty -- another facet of the
    > divine -- illuminates the way.

    Exactly "beauty" is another facet of Quality.

    Bo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 20 2005 - 17:21:34 GMT