From: Michael Hamilton (thethemichael@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 30 2005 - 15:38:28 GMT
Ian,
> Then you have missed my point - proof and disproof are different
> animals scientifically (atheistically). There is no such thing as
> positive proof, only absence of disproof.
I'm not sure I understand this. Are you referring to Popper's
falsificationist theory of science? Or that induction can never
provide certainty?
I could point out that there are perfectly atheistic positive proofs
in maths, but that would just be point-scoring.
> If you mean to say, you see equally valid areguments either way, then
> you are presumably agnostic, like Case, and not atheistic.
Precisely.
Regards,
Mike
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archives:
Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 30 2005 - 15:53:29 GMT