RE: MD A Question of Balance / Rules of the Game

From: Arlo J. Bensinger (ajb102@psu.edu)
Date: Sat Dec 03 2005 - 06:13:46 GMT

  • Next message: Platt Holden: "RE: FW: RE: MD Calling all atheists"

    [Case]
    Behaviorism seeks to explain all behavior. This would include behavior of
    any organism. Although I thought Skinner's Verbal Behavior had a lot going
    for it; it was not his greatest hit. I was pointing out that behaviorists
    have made great strides by focusing on what can be observed rather that what can
    be conceived of. Their account of how behavior is learned sounds a lot like
    what you were saying about semiotics. The whole representation thing.

    [Arlo]
    I don't discount behaviorism to the degree that it can help us understand hidden
    structures that influence our behavior. Indeed, many social structures turn to
    behaviorism for lessons on using behavior altering techniques on people (the
    famous study of restaurants painting their walls red to generate more client
    turnover, when red was found to significantly increase the rate of eating and
    diminish the likelihood of "hanging around", while blue walls slowed eating and
    made people hang around more). Advertising (although Platt considers it to be
    Holy and Pure) has long looked towards behavioral psychology (generating an
    entire branch called consumer psychology) to see how lessons learned in
    behavioral studies could be used to influence consumer behavior.

    But I think structuration is more adequate consideration of agency than
    behaviorism alone can provide. Structuration theories, for the most part, are
    not usually concerned with microgenetic variations (dogs salivating at a ringed
    bell), but are generally interested in cultural variations (why Eskimos see
    varieties of snow as different, or why people born poor also tend to die poor).
    In short, behaviorism tends to focus on the S->R moment, while structuration
    looks at patterned behavior over historical time.

    But to the question, "is behavior learned", the answer is of course, yes. The
    structurationists answer would be, "as external structures (symbolic and
    material) are appropriated over time, behavior (and thought) is guided towards
    social-cultural expressions expected by the immediate structural realities of
    the micro-cultural context." A mouthfull, to be sure, but worth digesting...

    Arlo

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Dec 03 2005 - 08:30:51 GMT