Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review

From: SQUONKSTAIL@aol.com
Date: Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:29:20 GMT

  • Next message: bahna@rpi.edu: "Re: MD Squonk wrote a Review"

    Andy:
    Again, you have not given an answer. You either like to play games and are
    amused by agitated responses to your incoherent posts or you are incapable
    of communicating an idea formed in your head. Is this your idea of what
    ART is?

    You might want to get away from that cold breeze and unthaw your head.

    Thank you
    Andy

    Hello Andy,
    I apologise for not giving clear answers.
    Please, i did not ask Matt to consider not having been born. I asked him
    another question, which was to consider not having joined the forum. That's
    quite a difference!
    If i ask myself the same question, i would say that i have tried to introduce
    a dynamic. I understand this has been black at times. Maybe it would have
    been better for me to have remained away?
    You see, i have used satire and a few jibes and jokes. The only people who
    are likely to be offended are those who hold social status dear? And they are
    precisely the ones who target themselves more than anything.
    The MoQ does not confine itself to intellectual concerns; Quality is
    fundamental at all evolutionary stages. If i act like a total 'you know what'
    it is for a purpose i assure you. Satire has been a tradition in my country
    for centuries, and it has done some very good things within the
    political/social sphere. (Think of Charles Dickens for example?)

    squonk

    MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
    Mail Archives:
    Aug '98 - Oct '02 - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
    Nov '02 Onward - http://www.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/summary.html
    MD Queries - horse@darkstar.uk.net

    To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
    http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 10 2003 - 20:29:57 GMT